MVSFORUMS.com Forum Index MVSFORUMS.com
A Community of and for MVS Professionals
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   Quick Manuals   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

IMS DC COBOL Program

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   printer-friendly view    MVSFORUMS.com Forum Index -> Application Programming
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nadh
Intermediate


Joined: 08 Oct 2004
Posts: 192
Topics: 89

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2011 1:46 pm    Post subject: IMS DC COBOL Program Reply with quote

Hi,

I'm facing a problem in COBOL - IMS DC online coding.

My requirement is, I'm having a menu of choices Add,Delete, and Inquiry. Add is strait forward. But inorder to Delete entry user need to perform Inquiry first and then only he should be permitted to Delete. If he tries to delete directly message should be displayed stating perform Inquiry First.

We are using intertest for debugging.

I've followed two methods to accomplish this requirement. I'll mention only problematic part I'm facing.
Method 1.
I've declared a hidden field in screen(MFS) for function (A,D and I) and after performing Inquiry I'm moving value from function field (I) to hidden field on screen. When user selects Delete function i will check the value in the hidden field and if it is 'I' will perform delete otherwise display message perform Inquiry first for the particular process.

Method 2.

If Inquiry is performed will set the switch in working storage to true for particular process. If delete is selected for the process will check the switch if it is true will delete otherwise display message to do inquiry first.

Both the above methods are working in INTERTEST. But if i run in IMSTEST region with the same load it is not working. After every read of screen..both the working storage in Method 2 and Hidden field in Method one are getting flushed. So not working..always displaying perform Inquiry first as switch and hidden fields are getting cleared when tested in IMSTEST.

Please suggest me the solution. Can I use working storage variable or screen hidden field to storing the data of function I,A, or D.

Thanks & Regards
Nadh
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
kolusu
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 26 Nov 2002
Posts: 12378
Topics: 75
Location: San Jose

PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2011 10:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nadh,

You cannot use Working storage variables to store a flag as this will flushed out. Update a flag in a DB2 table or IMS DB when an inquiry is done and check for it when the delete operation is requested.

Kolusu
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
nadh
Intermediate


Joined: 08 Oct 2004
Posts: 192
Topics: 89

PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2011 11:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Kolusu,

Thank you.

I've one doubt...I created one hidden field in screen to store the function value. that is if inquiry is done i will move value 'I' to hidden field. when delete function is performed i will check the value in hidden field if its 'I' then i will perform delete. this is working in when I test in intertest. But not working IMSTEST region. I checked with keeping display statements in program. It looks like hidden value in screen is also getting refreshed when run in IMSTEST. I see the existing programs in shop are using this hidden field concept. PLease give me a clue.

Thanks & Regards
Jagan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
prino
Banned


Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 45
Topics: 5
Location: Oostende

PostPosted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 12:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nadh wrote:
I see the existing programs in shop are using this hidden field concept.

So why don't you ask the people who wrote those programs how they did it, rather than spending time here waiting for an answer you are not going to get?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
papadi
Supermod


Joined: 20 Oct 2009
Posts: 594
Topics: 1

PostPosted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

I see the existing programs in shop are using this hidden field concept. PLease give me a clue.
Your clue should be that this is already in existing production code . . .

You need to ask your manager or support people if this "hidden field" is the standard way to code on your system.

We don't know the rules of your system.
_________________
All the best,

di
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nadh
Intermediate


Joined: 08 Oct 2004
Posts: 192
Topics: 89

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Folks,

Sorry for not conveying message clearly. What I mean is the existing programs are using hidden field concept. But the application is not in use. I'm developing new application and I've taken copy of the existing program. To be clear...there is no extra data base provided. I'm writing code in IMS DC/DB and I'm novoice in it. one of the requirement I've is if user needs to perform delete function first Inquiry should be done without Inquiry DELETE should not be allowed. I user selects delete without Inquiry message should be thrown as "perform Inquiry first". Please suggest me the way to do it.

Thanks
Nahd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
papadi
Supermod


Joined: 20 Oct 2009
Posts: 594
Topics: 1

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 3:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As you are new suggest you ask someone if the "hidden field" approach is still acceptable to the organization / management. If it is, you're good to go. If not, there should be some existing standard covering how this is to be done. If there is no standard, one needs to be implemented.

If you are writing an IMS program, an IMS database should be avaliable and you might use this for your "hidden field". Suggest you talk with your dba or some project senior.
_________________
All the best,

di
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
misi01
Advanced


Joined: 02 Dec 2002
Posts: 629
Topics: 176
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

PostPosted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wouldn't another simple option be to check the contents of various fields. If they contain something, then the user has performed a query first. As soon as you delete the item, you clear out the fields, after which they can't do a new delete until they've done a new query (or am I missing something caused by the hot weather we're enjoying at the moment).

Of course, another option would be to use a SPA database to pass the relevant variables between calls
_________________
Michael
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   printer-friendly view    MVSFORUMS.com Forum Index -> Application Programming All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


MVSFORUMS
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group