| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
abracadabra
Beginner
Joined: 02 Sep 2003
Posts: 101
Topics: 55
Location: India
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2005 10:00 am Post subject: BackUP job Abend |
 |
|
Hi,
I have a backup(DUMP) job which frequently abends. COuld the reason of the abend be because some of the datasets get migrated.? It gets the following abend
| Code: |
USER COMPLETION CODE=0008
TIME=10.16.10 SEQ=23336 CPU=0000 ASID=00A1
PSW AT TIME OF ERROR 478D1000 00007F80 ILC 2 INTC 0D
ACTIVE LOAD MODULE ADDRESS=00007CC0 OFFSET=000002C0
NAME=MUTILITY
DATA AT PSW 00007F7A - BF18C17C 0A0D181D 41000048
GR 0: 00000118 1: 80000008
2: 00000040 3: 00006E00
4: 009C39B0 5: 009FD098
6: 009ADFE0 7: 00006E64
8: 00000000 9: 00006FF8
A: 00000003 B: 00007E6E
C: 40007E7C D: 00006F18
E: 00FD26D0 F: 00000008
END OF SYMPTOM DUMP
IEF450I E1234BKP DUMP1 E1234BKP - ABEND=S000 U0008 REASON=00000000 692
|
It gives the following code for the migrated datasets.
ADR740W (001)-ADDXT(01)
I am completely at a loss to find out what the problem could be. Usually the job runs succsessfully when restarted again after 15-20 mins and either gives a return code of 004 or NTUCA (not sure what this means).
However, today it gave a return code of 008 when restarted the 2nd time as well.
I really need some help here.
Thanks
_________________
Cheers! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kolusu
Site Admin
Joined: 26 Nov 2002
Posts: 12378
Topics: 75
Location: San Jose
|
| Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 7:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
abracadabra,
check this for a detailed explanation of the error code U0008
| Code: |
U0008
Explanation: An error occurred performing I/O to the DFSMSrmm control data set during a LOGICAL DELETE request.
Module: EDGMTSO, EDGSOCE
System Action: Processing fails.
Operator Response: None
Programmer Response: Report this error to the system programmer.
System Programmer Response: A possible error exists in the logic of the DFSMSrmm control data set. Use the utility EDGUTIL to verify the contents of the DFSMSrmm control data set. |
Hope this helps...
Cheers
kolusu
_________________
Kolusu
www.linkedin.com/in/kolusu |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nevilh
Beginner
Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 115
Topics: 0
|
| Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Hi; Have I missed something here how did we get from u0008 in program MUTILITY (whatever that is) to a problem in RMM |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
abracadabra
Beginner
Joined: 02 Sep 2003
Posts: 101
Topics: 55
Location: India
|
| Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 8:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
If there are 2 dump jobs running at the same time and if both are trying to dum the same dataset, is there any chance of the jobs abending because of contention? I do not think so but wanted to know anyways.
This is not related to the abend I am getting now.
Thanks
_________________
Cheers! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
abracadabra
Beginner
Joined: 02 Sep 2003
Posts: 101
Topics: 55
Location: India
|
| Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
The job is abending because the first step fo the job scans off all the jobs to be backed up while the 2nd step actually backs up the files. However, between first and second step, a resource management job runs which deletes files which are more than a week old and thus when the 2nd step of the job runs, it does not find some files and abends.
Now my question again. Is it possible that 2 dump jobs can run at the same time without abending if they are backing up the same files.
Another question which I have stated before but have not found a good solution for. Is it possible to avoid backing up those files which have already been backed up. The DSCHA syntax did not work.
Thanks
_________________
Cheers! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nevilh
Beginner
Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 115
Topics: 0
|
| Posted: Fri May 06, 2005 2:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes it is possible and DSCHA processing works as documentedand will do what you want it to. Try reading up on DSCHA and the RESET parameter .
Please note that if your Sysprogs or Storage Admin people find you using the RESET parameter they may be somewhat less than pleased. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Quick Manuals
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
