View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kirank Beginner
Joined: 21 Apr 2004 Posts: 61 Topics: 33 Location: hyderabad
|
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 4:09 am Post subject: GDG question |
|
|
Hi,
Please clarify the following doubt.
I read that GDG's will be updated only after execution of the job. My question is what is exactly "Update" in this case? Please elaborate the term Update.
Thanks,
Kiran. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
blitz2 Beginner

Joined: 23 Jan 2007 Posts: 84 Topics: 14
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shagnwrx Beginner
Joined: 06 Jul 2006 Posts: 14 Topics: 0 Location: Birmingham, AL
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think he is referring to the GDG relative number itself.. If you create a new generation in step 1 of a job (+0), all subsequent steps in the same job that reference this new generation must code (0) as well... It doesn't become +1 until after the job completes (catalog) _________________ SCCA South East Division RallyCross |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bill Dennis Advanced

Joined: 03 Dec 2002 Posts: 579 Topics: 1 Location: Iowa, USA
|
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
shagnwrx,
you've got it backwards:
If you create a new generation in step 1 of a job (+1), all subsequent steps in the same job that reference this new generation must code (+1) as well... It doesn't become (0) until after the job completes. _________________ Regards,
Bill Dennis
Disclaimer: My comments on this foorum are my own and do not represent the opinions or suggestions of any other person or business entity. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nic Clouston Advanced
Joined: 01 Feb 2007 Posts: 1075 Topics: 7 Location: At Home
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Please note that the job does not have to terminate correctly as long as the step creating the GDG dataset completes OK - and even then what happens depends on the DISP used. _________________ Utility and Program control cards are NOT, repeat NOT, JCL. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shagnwrx Beginner
Joined: 06 Jul 2006 Posts: 14 Topics: 0 Location: Birmingham, AL
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bill Dennis wrote: | shagnwrx,
you've got it backwards:
If you create a new generation in step 1 of a job (+1), all subsequent steps in the same job that reference this new generation must code (+1) as well... It doesn't become (0) until after the job completes. |
DOH!.. Yeah, that's exactly what I meant! OOPS..Ahem.. (+1) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vak255 Intermediate

Joined: 10 Sep 2004 Posts: 384 Topics: 79
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
what if job abends in the second step ? when we restart the step2..do we need to refer it as 0? I think it should be. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
prasanth_thavva Beginner

Joined: 14 May 2006 Posts: 40 Topics: 18
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
S, we need to refer it with 0. _________________ Thanks&Regards
Prasanth Thavva |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|