| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
kolusu
Site Admin
Joined: 26 Nov 2002
Posts: 12375
Topics: 75
Location: San Jose
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 10:39 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Quote: |
Yes kolusu,
I understand the abend ..but what i mean to say is that we cannot predict the occurance of S0C7 right
|
Aquarian,
May be this will clarify your Doubt about predicting the S0C7 abend
System ABEND: S0C7
Description: This ABEND is caused by a data exception and can only occur when decimal (packed) instructions are used.
One of the following can cause this error:
O The sign or digit codes of one or more bytes manipulated by the packed or CONVERT TO BINARY instructions is invalid for packed decimal use. Packed decimal digits must be in the range 0 through 9, with only the sign (i.e., rightmost) digit being a digit in the range A through F.
O Fields in decimal (packed) arithmetic overlap incorrectly.
O A packed decimal multiplicand has too many high-order significant digits.
O The target operand of a CVD assembler instruction is not on a doubleword boundary
Possible causes for this abend include:
Subscript error, referenced beyond table
COBOL: working storage not initialized bad data, should check data for errors garbage in a field being tested or displayed 'move zeroes' to group level is display, had sublevels that were not period missing after imperative statements within AT END clause binary field in an arithmetic operation is not large enough to accept result
User Action: Correct the format of the data being manipulated by the packed decimal instructions in the program and resubmit the job.
The reason code associated with this ABEND can be found in the SDWAXDC field in the SDWA (System Diagnostic Work Area) control block. If you use an ESTAE routine with your program, you can gain access to the SDWA via your ESTAE routine.
_________________
Kolusu
www.linkedin.com/in/kolusu |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
muralikrishnan
Beginner
Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 19
Topics: 11
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi All,
In my sysout compile JCL I couldn't locate HEXLOC.
Should I have to use XREF compiler option? If yes, how will I specify.
Please correct me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kolusu
Site Admin
Joined: 26 Nov 2002
Posts: 12375
Topics: 75
Location: San Jose
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
muralikrishnan,
Any compiler options can be overridern with CBL statements in the beginning of the program.(before ID division)
or
If the program was compiled with the LIST/OFFSET options, then you will have an assembler listing, and you should be able to find this offset directly.
Hope this helps...
Cheers
Kolusu
_________________
Kolusu
www.linkedin.com/in/kolusu |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
muralikrishnan
Beginner
Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 19
Topics: 11
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks Kolusu. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
German Castillo
Beginner
Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 83
Topics: 2
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just adding on..
You can deal with SYSUDUMP, finding statements/operands addresses and look into that address, but there is an easier way if you do not particularly like to deal with system dumps and the like.
Compile your program with VBREF & TEST(SYM), this wont' prevent your S0C7 but your CEEDUMP will be formatted in a nicer way, The verb ref will force the showing of your offending instruction line, along with the calling path, and the symbolic information provided by the second parm will make your operands at either working storage or linkage section, to be nicely, and readable formatted. In that way you will lnow your operands contents very quickly and eansy. The resolution of the abend shouldn't take long from that point onward.
_________________
Best wishes,
German Castillo |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vak255
Intermediate
Joined: 10 Sep 2004
Posts: 384
Topics: 79
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi kolusu,
I have a doubt whether comp-3 field can be moved to display field. I know we move display field to comp-3 for various output reasons. But can you tell me when we required to move display to comp-3. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jaya
Beginner
Joined: 02 Sep 2005
Posts: 77
Topics: 10
Location: Cincinnati
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Quick Manuals
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
